Money

Change starts at home first.
Art at Recology SF.

Housing in the San Francisco Bay Area continues to be one of the most expensive enterprises in America.  Growing up in the Midwest, I thought driving 30 minutes was an ordeal and rent at $500 a month to be outrageous.  So with congestion, higher taxes, and endurance testing commutes- diversity, opportunities, access to museums, and public art replenishes the spirit while sharpening the need for collective critical thinking.  Then why would some developers want to get rid of a local city’s new Public Art Ordinance?  Money, of course!

Never enough.
Enough.

The BIA Bay Area (Building Industry Association of the Bay Area) decided to sue the city of Oakland’s Percent for Art Ordinance.  They claim that the law violates their First and Fifth amendments.  According to Benjamin Sutton of HYPERALLERGIC: “The group, which represents some 300 builders, contractors, suppliers, and other players in the Bay Area housing industry, claims that the ordinance violates the Fifth Amendment’s protection against ‘uncompensated takings’ by requiring developers to pay a fee or commit to providing public art in order to obtain building permits.”

Close-up of Youth Voice and Community Empowerment Mural by Veronica Orozco/RYSE Center.
Close-up of Youth Voice and Community Empowerment Mural by Veronica Orozco/RYSE Center.

Not a legal expert, I can imagine the arguments against paying for Public Art endeavors.  Developers most likely want a higher profit margin, a quicker turnaround, less community involvement and limited social responsibility.  In addition, Public Art raises building costs a minimal amount.  If a small portion of their budget results in an artwork of their disliking, it would be the end of the world!

Have a heart.
Have a heart.

There are many things that I don’t want to pay for: war, institutional racism, and Wall Street bailouts to name a few.  However, this doesn’t stop me from paying taxes.  Being a part of society includes being a responsible citizen.  Democracy wasn’t built on unanimous agreement.  Positive engagement softens distrust and lays the foundation for future projects.

Home.
Pride.

Public Art injects positive discourse, a respite, and life into urban environments.  It becomes a feature that makes new properties desirable and daily existence bearable.  Art is a gesture and acknowledgement to a community that a developer can be a serious and sincere partner.

Susan O'Malley, San Pablo Ave., Berkeley, California, USA.
Susan O’Malley, San Pablo Ave., Berkeley, California, USA.

Art teaches not to settle for less and to be better.  It questions and provides neighborhood pride while connecting humanity.  Without it, buildings become just another sterile cube in which humans enter and exit from one task to another.   For a small .5 to 1% investment of a construction budget, the returns are priceless.

We can do this and must.

Links:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3239257/In-America-s-expensive-city-350K-buys-San-Francisco.html

http://hyperallergic.com/225052/real-estate-developers-sue-oakland-over-new-public-art-ordinance/

http://ww2.kqed.org/arts/2015/07/28/artists-aghast-at-anti-public-art-lawsuit-against-oakland/

http://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Big-legal-guns-take-aim-at-Oakland-s-public-art-6408586.php

https://news.artnet.com/art-world/oakland-sued-by-developers-over-public-art-319896

 

One thought on “Money

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s